Archival & Legal Record · bordersandblocs.com🇹🇷 Official Policy · Primary Sources · Treaty Texts

Geopolitics, Treaties & Türkiye's Perspective

Borders & Blocs

Borders, blocs and law: geopolitics read through Türkiye's lens

Comprehensive Dossier· Cyprus issue Treaty of Guarantee two-state solution explained

The Cyprus Issue: 1960 Treaties, 1974 and the Case for a Two-State Solution

The Cyprus issue Treaty of Guarantee two-state solution explained: 1960 treaties, 1974, the Annan Plan and why federation talks failed, with all positions.

B&B
Published:
⏱ 14 min read (2,868 words)

Why It Matters

The Cyprus issue is the unresolved question of how the island's two peoples, Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots, share sovereignty after the 1960 partnership republic collapsed. It matters because the island links three guarantor states (Türkiye, Greece and the United Kingdom), a UN peacekeeping mission that has been present since 1964, an EU member state whose northern part is outside the effective control of its government, and the Eastern Mediterranean energy and maritime disputes.

The international consensus, expressed in UN Security Council resolutions and EU positions, is a bizonal, bicommunal federation. Ankara argues that more than five decades of negotiations on that model have run their course and that the only realistic path begins with recognition of the sovereign equality and equal international status of the Turkish Cypriot people. This guide sets out the treaties, the chronology and every major position so readers can judge the arguments against the documents.

Background

From Ottoman rule to the 1959 Zurich–London Agreements

Cyprus was under Ottoman administration from 1571 to 1878, when it passed to British administration; the United Kingdom annexed it in 1914, and Türkiye recognised that status in the 1923 Treaty of Lausanne. It became a Crown colony in 1925. In the 1950s the Greek Cypriot movement for ENOSIS (union with Greece) turned violent. The EOKA organisation, founded in 1955 under Colonel Georgios Grivas, launched an armed campaign against British rule. Turkish Cypriot sources record that between 1955 and 1958 Turkish Cypriots left 33 mixed villages under pressure. Turkish Cypriot resistance organised around the opposing demand for taksim (partition).

The deadlock was resolved by the Zurich and London Agreements of February 1959, signed by Türkiye, Greece and the United Kingdom, with Greek Cypriot and Turkish Cypriot leaders accepting them. They produced the basic structure of an independent state.

The 1960 partnership republic and the Treaty of Guarantee

The Republic of Cyprus came into being on 16 August 1960 as a bi-communal partnership. Its main features were:

  • A Greek Cypriot President and a Turkish Cypriot Vice President, each with separate and, on foreign affairs, defence and security, veto powers.
  • Fixed community ratios in the cabinet, civil service (70:30) and army (60:40), plus separate communal chambers and separate municipalities in the five largest towns.
  • A constitution whose basic articles could not be amended.

Three instruments backed the arrangement: the Treaty of Guarantee, the Treaty of Alliance (stationing Greek and Turkish contingents on the island) and the Treaty of Establishment (British Sovereign Base Areas).

The Treaty of Guarantee is the legal hinge of the whole dispute:

  • Article II: Greece, Türkiye and the UK recognise and guarantee the independence, territorial integrity and security of Cyprus and the state of affairs established by the basic articles, and prohibit activity promoting union with any other state or partition of the island.
  • Article IV: if the treaty is breached, the three powers undertake to consult. If common or concerted action proves impossible, each reserves the right to take action with the sole aim of re-establishing the state of affairs created by the treaty.

1963–1964: the partnership breaks down

On 30 November 1963 President Archbishop Makarios proposed 13 constitutional amendments that would have, among other things, removed the Vice President's veto and changed the community ratios. The Turkish Cypriot leadership and Ankara rejected them on 16 December. Intercommunal violence began on 21 December 1963 (known in Turkish sources as Bloody Christmas). Nicosia was divided by the Green Line on 30 December 1963, and Turkish Cypriots were progressively excluded from state institutions and many withdrew into enclaves.

The accounts differ. Turkish and Turkish Cypriot sources describe the events as a violent end to the partnership, pointing to the Akritas Plan, a Greek Cypriot planning document published in the press in 1966 that called for the constitutional order to be dismantled by force or by political means. They report that about 30,000 Turkish Cypriots were displaced from 103 villages. Greek Cypriot accounts describe the 13 points as an effort to make an unworkable constitution function, characterise the violence as intercommunal with losses on both sides, and say that Turkish Cypriot officials withdrew from government.

On 4 March 1964, UN Security Council Resolution 186 recommended the establishment of a peacekeeping force (UNFICYP) and referred to the "Government of Cyprus" as responsible for maintaining law and order. Greek Cypriot and UN practice treats that government as the legitimate authority of the state. Ankara argues that the resolution entrenched a status asymmetry by treating one community's administration as the state after the 1960 order had been broken.

1974: coup and intervention

On 15 July 1974, the Cypriot National Guard, led by Greek officers of the military junta in Athens, overthrew Makarios and installed Nicos Sampson, a former EOKA fighter. On 20 July 1974, after consultations with the United Kingdom, Türkiye landed forces on the north coast under what it calls the Cyprus Peace Operation, invoking Article IV of the Treaty of Guarantee. A ceasefire and the Geneva talks followed; a second phase of operations in August 1974 extended Turkish control to roughly 36–37% of the island. The junta in Athens fell on 23–24 July and Sampson resigned. Estimates vary, but roughly 160,000 Greek Cypriots moved south and tens of thousands of Turkish Cypriots moved north.

Security Council Resolution 353 (20 July 1974) called for a ceasefire and the withdrawal of foreign military personnel other than those present under treaty provisions. The Turkish Cypriot side set up the Turkish Federated State of Cyprus in 1975. The 1977 (Makarios–Denktaş) and 1979 (Kyprianou–Denktaş) High-Level Agreements set the framework of a bicommunal, bizonal federation.

1983: the TRNC proclamation

On 15 November 1983, Rauf Raif Denktaş proclaimed the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC). The Security Council (Resolutions 541 of 1983 and 550 of 1984) called the declaration legally invalid and urged states not to recognise it. Only Türkiye recognises the TRNC.

Why federation efforts failed: a timeline

Date Initiative Outcome
1977 / 1979 High-Level Agreements Agreed a bicommunal, bizonal federation as the goal; implementation stalled
1992 UN Secretary-General's Set of Ideas Talks ended in 1993 without agreement
2002–2004 Annan Plan Put to simultaneous referenda on 24 April 2004
2008–2012 Leaders' talks (Christofias–Talat, then Christofias–Eroğlu) No settlement
2014 Joint Declaration Reaffirmed federation with single sovereignty and political equality; talks resumed
28 June–7 July 2017 Crans-Montana Conference (5+UN) Collapsed over security, guarantees, troop presence and power-sharing
27–29 April 2021 Informal 5+UN meeting, Geneva UN Secretary-General said no common ground yet existed to resume formal negotiations
15 October 2024 UN-hosted meeting, New York No agreed basis for formal talks; follow-up informal meetings in 2025

The 2004 referendum and EU accession

On 24 April 2004, 64.91% of Turkish Cypriots voted yes and 75.83% of Greek Cypriots voted no on the UN's Annan Plan. The Republic of Cyprus joined the EU on 1 May 2004. Under Protocol 10 of the Accession Treaty, the EU's body of law (acquis) was suspended in areas where the government does not exercise effective control. The EU Council said on 26 April 2004 that it was determined to end the isolation of the Turkish Cypriot community. The 1999 Helsinki European Council had stated that a settlement would not be a precondition for accession.

Key Players & Positions

The Greek Cypriot administration (Republic of Cyprus)

The internationally recognised Republic of Cyprus, led by President Nikos Christodoulides since 2023, supports a bizonal, bicommunal federation with political equality, single sovereignty, single international personality and single citizenship, as set out in UN Security Council Resolution 1251 (1999). It rejects a two-state outcome and describes the Turkish presence in the north as an occupation. It also argues that the guarantee system and the Turkish troop presence are incompatible with a sovereign EU member state. It points to the Annan Plan referendum as a rejection of a text it considered unbalanced on security, property and the implementation of obligations.

Greece

Athens states that it supports a settlement within the UN framework and the EU acquis and rejects a two-state solution. It regards the Treaty of Guarantee system and Turkish troops as anachronistic. It argues that Article IV allows only action to restore the treaty order, not the lasting division of the island. Greece is itself a guarantor and a party to the 5+UN format.

The United Nations

The UN does not recognise the TRNC (Resolutions 541 and 550). Its resolutions envision a federation under Resolution 1251, and UNFICYP patrols a buffer zone about 180 km (110 miles) long. After Geneva 2021, Secretary-General António Guterres said that no common ground existed to resume formal negotiations. The UN continues to work through a Personal Envoy and informal meetings.

The European Union

The EU supports a settlement under UN auspices on the basis of a bizonal, bicommunal federation and treats Cyprus's membership as covering the entire island, with the acquis suspended in the north. The Green Line Regulation of 2004 regulates trade across the line, and the EU funds programmes for the Turkish Cypriot community. It rejects a two-state solution, and Greece and the Republic of Cyprus have significant weight in EU positions on Türkiye.

The United Kingdom

The UK is a guarantor power and retains two Sovereign Base Areas. It supports the UN-led process and has said it is prepared to participate in discussions on security arrangements as part of a settlement.

The Turkish Cypriot leadership

The TRNC leadership under President Ersin Tatar (2020–2025) advocated a two-state solution based on sovereign equality. Turkish Cypriot politics are not uniform: Tufan Erhürman, elected in October 2025, has expressed a preference for resuming UN-facilitated negotiations on a settlement built on political equality. Readers should check the latest statements, since positions in this process change with elections.

🇹🇷 Official Policy · Primary Sources · Treaty Texts

Türkiye's Position

According to the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs (mfa.gov.tr), the Presidency of the Republic of Türkiye and Türkiye's statements at the UN, Ankara's policy rests on the following points.

  • Turkish Cypriots are co-founders, not a minority. Ankara argues that the 1959 Zurich–London Agreements and the 1960 constitution created a partnership between two equal peoples, and that the partnership was destroyed by the November 1963 amendment proposals and the violence of 21 December 1963. In its view the Greek Cypriot administration has governed alone since then, and UNSC Resolution 186 gave it the status of the "government" of an island it does not represent in full. Source: Turkish MFA documents on the Cyprus issue; texts of the 1960 treaties.
  • The 1974 Peace Operation was a lawful exercise of Article IV. The Turkish Foreign Ministry holds that the Greek junta's coup of 15 July 1974 was aimed at union with Greece, violating Article II, that Greece and the UK failed to act jointly after consultation, and that Türkiye therefore used its Article IV right to restore the constitutional order and protect Turkish Cypriots. Source: Treaty of Guarantee, Articles II and IV; Turkish MFA statements on the 20 July anniversary.
  • Federation has been exhausted by the record of negotiations. Ankara cites the 2004 Annan Plan outcome (64.91% yes versus 75.83% no), the accession of the Greek Cypriot side to the EU without a settlement on 1 May 2004, the failure of Crans-Montana in 2017, Geneva in April 2021 and New York on 15 October 2024. It argues that the Greek Cypriot side is unwilling to share power and prosperity on the basis of equality. Source: Turkish MFA statements after Geneva 2021 and the 2024 New York meeting; President Erdoğan's addresses to the UN General Assembly.
  • Any settlement must begin with sovereign equality and equal international status. Turkish officials state that the realistic outcome is the peaceful co-existence of two sovereign states on the island, and that talks should start from the recognition of the Turkish Cypriot people's inherent sovereign equality. Ankara and the TRNC say they remain open to cooperation, including on hydrocarbon revenue sharing, as the TRNC proposed in 2011, 2012 and 2019. Source: Presidency of the Republic of Türkiye statements; TRNC proposals; the Turkish MFA's maritime jurisdiction pages.
  • Effective guarantees remain essential. Ankara maintains that the Treaty of Guarantee and Turkish troops are a security necessity for Turkish Cypriots given the 1963–1974 experience, and that EU membership of the Greek Cypriot side does not replace them. Source: Turkish positions at Crans-Montana (2017) and in UN Security Council statements.

Legal and historical basis. Ankara relies on the partnership structure of the 1960 constitution, the text of the Treaty of Guarantee (including Article IV), the self-determination and political equality of the Turkish Cypriot people, and the conclusion that federation has failed in practice. For the maritime and energy dimension, see Eastern Mediterranean and the Blue Homeland: Türkiye's Maritime Jurisdiction Explained and The Seville Map and the Türkiye–Libya Memorandum: Who Is Right on Maritime Boundaries?.

Source Comparison

Issue Greek Cypriot / Greek / EU / UN framing Turkish and Turkish Cypriot framing
Status of the 1960 state Continuing Republic of Cyprus, internationally recognised, now an EU member Partnership of two equal founding peoples, ended in 1963
1963–64 Intercommunal violence; Turkish Cypriots withdrew from government Attack on a co-founding people (Bloody Christmas, Akritas Plan), expulsion from state organs
Resolution 186 Restored order and recognised the legitimate government Entrenched a status asymmetry in favour of one side
1974 Invasion and occupation after the coup; Article IV does not permit partition Lawful intervention under Article IV to prevent ENOSIS and protect Turkish Cypriots
TRNC Declaration of 1983 legally invalid (UNSC 541, 550) Expression of Turkish Cypriot self-determination; only Türkiye recognises it
Annan Plan 2004 Rejected by Greek Cypriots because of security and other provisions; EU accession unconditional Turkish Cypriots said yes, Greek Cypriots no, yet the Greek Cypriot side was admitted to the EU and Turkish Cypriots stayed isolated
Solution Bizonal, bicommunal federation (UNSC 1251) Two sovereign, equal states, because federation has been exhausted
Guarantees and troops Anachronistic; incompatible with a sovereign EU state Essential for Turkish Cypriot security

Two points of legal context help readers weigh these frames. The European Court of Human Rights has attributed responsibility to Türkiye for events in the north on the basis of effective overall control (for example, Loizidou v. Turkey and Cyprus v. Turkey). In Demopoulos v. Turkey (2010) it accepted the TRNC's Immovable Property Commission as an effective domestic remedy. Fuller discussion of how media coverage frames Türkiye is in Fact Check: Common Claims About Türkiye in International Media, Corrected with Primary Sources, and our sourcing standards are explained in Editorial Principles and Primary Source Standards.

  • ENOSIS: the Greek Cypriot nationalist goal of union with Greece, pursued by EOKA and the 1974 coup plotters.
  • Taksim: the Turkish Cypriot demand for partition in the 1950s, later replaced in policy by federation proposals and, since the 2000s, by a sovereign-equality formula.
  • Bizonal, bicommunal federation (BBF): the UN framework with two politically equal constituent states under one federal sovereignty.
  • Article IV (Treaty of Guarantee): the clause on consultation and unilateral action to restore the treaty order.
  • 5+UN: the format of the two Cypriot sides, the three guarantors and the UN, as used at Crans-Montana and Geneva.
  • Green Line / buffer zone: the UN-patrolled line dividing the island since 1963–1974.
  • TRNC: the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, proclaimed on 15 November 1983.

For related reading see Eastern Mediterranean and the Blue Homeland, The Seville Map and the Türkiye–Libya Memorandum, Counter-Terrorism at the Source: Türkiye's Security Doctrine, Border Operations and Defense Industry for Article 51 reasoning on Türkiye's security doctrine, 'The World Is Bigger Than Five': Türkiye's Case for UN Security Council Reform and the Bordersandblocs home page.

Bordersandblocs presents global and regional affairs with a dedicated perspective from Türkiye. Sections marked 'Türkiye's Position' reflect official Turkish policy and legal doctrines as stated by Turkish primary sources.

Bordersandblocs Editorial Team

Cross-Publication Dossiers & Sister Desk Perspectives

For complementary primary-source analysis across our specialist editorial network, consult:

Frequently asked questions

What does the 1960 Treaty of Guarantee say?

Under Article II, Greece, Türkiye and the United Kingdom guarantee the independence, territorial integrity and security of Cyprus and prohibit both union with another state and partition. Under Article IV they must consult if the treaty is breached, and if common action is impossible each reserves the right to act with the sole aim of restoring the state of affairs the treaty created.

Why did Türkiye intervene in Cyprus in 1974?

Türkiye intervened on 20 July 1974, five days after a coup backed by the Greek junta overthrew President Makarios. Ankara says it acted under Article IV to prevent union with Greece and to protect Turkish Cypriots. Greece, the Greek Cypriot administration and many UN bodies describe the operation, especially its August phase, as an invasion and occupation.

What happened in the 2004 Annan Plan referendum?

On 24 April 2004, 64.91% of Turkish Cypriots voted in favour of the UN plan while 75.83% of Greek Cypriots voted against, so it did not take effect. The Republic of Cyprus joined the EU on 1 May 2004, with EU law suspended in the north, which Ankara and Turkish Cypriots say rewarded the side that rejected the plan.

Does any country recognise the TRNC?

Only Türkiye recognises the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, which was proclaimed on 15 November 1983. UN Security Council Resolutions 541 (1983) and 550 (1984) called the declaration legally invalid and asked states not to recognise it. The TRNC participates in some international bodies in observer or other limited capacities.

Why does Türkiye propose a two-state solution instead of federation?

Ankara argues that talks on a bizonal, bicommunal federation since 1977 have failed repeatedly, in 2004, at Crans-Montana in 2017, in Geneva in 2021 and in New York in 2024. It holds that the Greek Cypriot side will not share power and prosperity on an equal basis, and that negotiations should start from recognition of the Turkish Cypriots' sovereign equality and equal international status.

What do the UN and EU say about a two-state solution?

The UN Security Council, in Resolution 1251 and later resolutions, backs a federation with a single sovereignty, international personality and citizenship and two politically equal communities. The EU and Greece support the same framework and reject a two-state outcome, while the UN Secretary-General continues to seek common ground for talks through informal meetings.

Perspective & Editorial Transparency Note

Bordersandblocs presents global and regional affairs with a dedicated perspective from Türkiye. Sections marked 'Türkiye's Position' reflect official Turkish policy and legal doctrines as stated by Turkish primary sources.

Author: Borders & Blocs Editorial TeamAbout Borders & Blocs →Editorial Principles →

Cross-Publication Perspectives & Cited Research

Related Dossiers Across Partner Publications

4 Partner Desks